What was recalled
This page synthesizes the industry pattern around Simmons Pet Food’s co-manufacturing model in the wet (canned and pouch) pet food category. Simmons Pet Food is a division of Simmons Foods Inc., a privately-held Arkansas-based food processing conglomerate with operations spanning poultry processing (Simmons Prepared Foods), private-label canned vegetables and prepared foods (Simmons Foods), and pet food (Simmons Pet Food). The pet food division is one of the three largest US wet pet food manufacturers and the single largest US private-label wet pet food co-manufacturer. The flagship Emporia, Kansas plant was built in the 1980s as a private-label canning facility and has been expanded multiple times across the 2000s and 2010s; the plant has annual capacity exceeding 1 billion cans plus pouch capacity.
The co-manufactured brand portfolio across the 2010-2024 window includes (at various points; relationships are not static and brand-by-brand confirmation requires direct manufacturer contact): Walmart Pure Balance wet pet food (long-standing relationship), Target Kindfull (some specific wet SKUs), Kroger Abound, Sprouts brand wet pet food, Petco brand wet pet food (some specific SKUs across the Wholehearted and Reddy brand identities), Petsmart Authority brand wet pet food (some SKUs), and additional private-label wet products for grocery chains, farm and feed retailers, drugstore chains, and online direct-to-consumer brands. The relationships are dynamic — some brands have moved production to other co-manufacturers (American Nutrition, Performance Pet Products, Diamond Pet Foods’ wet division when active) or brought production in-house at various points — but Simmons consistently anchors the largest private-label wet pet food production volume in the US.
The historical contamination events at Simmons plants are less frequent than at Diamond plants but include: (i) 2007 melamine event tangential involvement — Simmons was not directly implicated in the 2007 Menu Foods melamine event (Menu Foods was a separate Canadian co-manufacturer that operated facilities in Pennsylvania and Kansas; Menu Foods was acquired by Simmons in 2010); (ii) routine FDA inspection observations across the 2010-2024 window with periodic Form 483 observations and corrective actions, none escalating to public Class I or Class II recalls in the documented FDA recall history; (iii) limited-scope withdrawals at the lot level for occasional manufacturing-defect concerns (foreign material, labeling errors, formulation deviation) handled at the brand-customer-service tier without FDA Class I recall classification. The Simmons safety record is generally cleaner than the Diamond safety record across the 2010-2024 window, though the structural concentration of supply chain risk across multiple brands at shared plants applies identically.
Why it was recalled
The structural concerns mirror the Diamond pattern. Layer one — shared-plant production concentrates wet pet food supply chain risk: when a Simmons plant experiences a contamination event, multiple downstream brands produced on the affected line are potentially affected simultaneously. The 2007 melamine event, while Simmons-pre-acquisition (Menu Foods was the implicated manufacturer), demonstrates the structural risk: a single contaminated wheat-gluten ingredient sourced by a major co-manufacturer affected dozens of downstream private-label and branded wet pet food products across the US and Canada. The structural pattern persists at Simmons post-Menu-Foods-acquisition (2010) and at every other major wet pet food co-manufacturer.
Layer two — wet pet food co-manufacturing is even less transparent than dry kibble co-manufacturing at the consumer-facing tier: wet pet food cans and pouches typically carry minimal "manufactured by" or "distributed by" disclosure due to small label real estate; the disclosure is often abbreviated to a city/state code or a corporate-parent name that does not surface the actual co-manufacturer. A Walmart Pure Balance wet pet food buyer is unlikely to discover the Simmons co-manufacturing relationship from the label alone; the relationship surfaces through industry trade publications, FDA inspection records, and occasional investigative reporting.
Layer three — private-label wet pet food economics drive co-manufacturing concentration: wet pet food production requires capital-intensive canning lines, sterilization equipment (retort cookers), and pouch-sealing infrastructure that small specialty brands cannot economically build. The fixed-cost structure of wet pet food production favors high-volume shared facilities over distributed small-batch production, which structurally concentrates the industry into a small number of major co-manufacturers (Simmons, Performance Pet Products, American Nutrition, Hill’s Pet Nutrition’s owned wet plants, Mars Petcare owned wet plants, J.M. Smucker owned wet plants from the Big Heart Pet Brands legacy). The structural concentration is unlikely to reverse through market forces and represents the structural baseline against which transparency and recall-risk frameworks should be evaluated. The framework is covered in additional depth at our co-manufactured pet food quality control framework page.
Health risks for your pet
Direct health risks from the Simmons co-manufacturing pattern are zero — co-manufacturing is a production-structure choice, not an ingredient. Indirect health risks emerge through the same recall-risk concentration mechanism as the Diamond pattern: (i) contamination-event scope across multiple downstream brands; (ii) recall-detection latency as affected brands recall in sequence; (iii) cross-contamination from shared retort equipment, ingredient handling, and pouch-sealing lines. The Simmons safety record across 2010-2024 has not produced a Diamond-2012-scale event; the structural risk is comparable but the historical realization has been lower.
The wet-pet-food-specific safety framework differs from dry kibble in several respects relevant to the co-manufacturing concentration: (i) wet pet food relies on retort cooking and hermetic sealing to achieve commercial sterility, which is generally more robust than the dry kibble extrusion kill-step against bacterial pathogens; (ii) wet pet food formulation includes higher water activity which makes contamination events more visible (swollen cans, leaking pouches, visible spoilage) than in dry kibble; (iii) wet pet food shelf life is typically 24-36 months at commercial sterility versus 12-18 months for dry kibble, which shifts the contamination risk window. The structural co-manufacturing concentration applies to both categories but the per-event health-outcome risk profile differs.
What to do if you bought affected product
Pet owners interested in navigating the Simmons co-manufacturing pattern can take several practical approaches: (1) recognize that most US private-label wet pet food at major retailers comes from Simmons — Walmart Pure Balance, Target Kindfull (specific SKUs), Kroger Abound, and grocery-store and farm-store private-label wet products are predominantly Simmons-produced; this concentrates supply chain risk regardless of which private label you choose; (2) diversify across categories rather than across private labels — rotating between Simmons-produced private-label wet, branded wet from a different co-manufacturer (Hill’s, Royal Canin, Purina Pro Plan use owned plants), and a different food format (dry kibble, freeze-dried, gently-cooked) gives more supply-chain diversification than rotating across private-label wet brands; (3) understand that branded wet pet food from major manufacturers typically uses owned plants — Hill’s Science Diet, Royal Canin, and Purina Pro Plan wet products are predominantly produced at owned plants by Hill’s, Royal Canin (Mars), and Purina (Nestlé) respectively; private-label and specialty brands more typically use co-manufacturers; (4) monitor FDA recall press releases broadly across wet pet food — a Simmons plant event would surface across multiple private-label brands; tracking only one brand misses the broader scope; (5) evaluate price-per-protein-density rather than per-can or per-pouch when comparing Simmons-co-manufactured private labels against branded wet pet food — the price advantage of private label is substantial and the per-formula quality is generally acceptable for the specific Simmons-produced recipes, with the tradeoff being shared supply chain risk; (6) contact brand customer service for co-manufacturer confirmation — brands disclose co-manufacturing relationships unevenly; transparent brands will confirm, less-transparent brands deflect; the response pattern is a useful trust signal.
How this affects KibbleIQ’s grade
The KibbleIQ rubric v15 does not currently grade many wet pet food products in detail per our published methodology (current focus is dry kibble with selected wet, freeze-dried, and fresh categories). The structural Simmons co-manufacturing concentration is relevant to wet pet food trust framework but does not directly affect rubric grades on the dry side. Future rubric extensions under consideration: wet pet food category expansion with explicit co-manufacturer transparency scoring; recall-history deduction applicable across all major US pet food co-manufacturers. The broader framework is covered across our co-manufactured pet food quality control framework, Diamond Pet Foods co-manufacturing pattern, and private-label pet food controversy pages. For now, our recommendation: treat Simmons-co-manufactured wet pet food brands as a single supply-chain risk unit; the Simmons safety record across 2010-2024 has been cleaner than the Diamond record but the structural concentration is comparable.